“ केंद्रीय सरकार के कर्मचारियों की सेवानिवृत्ति आयु में वृद्धि करेंगे ? “
Retirement age of Central Government employees may be increased from existing 60 to 62 .
Latest News on Babus Retirement Age Increase
The top two officials in the state administration of Andhra Pradesh, chief secretary, Mr S.V. Prasad, and the director-general of police, Mr K. Aravinda Rao, will benefit from the Centre’s decision to set the retirement age for civil servants at 62 years from the present 60 years. Mr Aravinda Rao was due to retire in June and the chief secretary in September.
Sources told this newspaper that the Cabinet subcommittee of the Union government gave its nod for enhancing the retirement age, and orders amending the service rules are expected much before the retirement of the two officials. The Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, was keen to enhance the retirement age of bureaucrats.
Sources said that though the proposal is ready for implementation, there will be a few months’ delay because the government wants to make Mr Pulok Chatterjee the new Cabinet secretary at the Centre and prefers to wait for bureaucrats senior to him to retire before it makes the announcement.
Mr Chatterjee had earlier worked with the UPA chairperson, Mrs Sonia Gandhi, and is considered a natural choice to take over from the incumbent Mr K.M. Chandrasekhar. “There are a few bureaucrats senior to Mr Chatterjee and the Centre will wait for their retirement in April,” explained a senior official.
Source: Deccan Chronicle
Share with the world !!
In India, there are number of person un-employee. I think it is not a good & fair idea of any government. Why government want to increase the retirement age of central government employees from 60 years to 62 years. It is not justice with young child.
please spare us from this ordeal of continuing with the seniors already retired at work but taking the most benefits now and give way to the new generation to do better for the nation.
It is better to increase retirement age to 62 years considering they are well experienced and ,large amount of money is trained out from government exchequer towards pension. So, it is always good to utilize their experience in favor of government work.Moreover, life expectancy has also been increased. Govt should also think to increase recruitment age proportionate to increase in retirement age so, that youngsters should also be benefited.
Requirement age of government employees should be increased as they are well experienced and can be utilized. A huge amount of money from the government exchequer is simply drained out towards pension which can be compensated. Make proportionate increase of recruitment age for young lot
is it for all central govt. employees or only for buerocrats?
IN INDIA there is large number of unemployee, instead of increased retirement age govt. should decreased the age from 60 to 58. for few officials/buerocrats why govt. favouring.
NO NEVER 60 years is ok.but not 62yrs.its not gud for youngers.
Experienced in what ????? Just to facilitate some big babu's why are u letting the youngsters suffer more in the hands of such bureaucrats who are doing nothing and playing spoilsport in the juniors career.
EVERY GOVERNMENT SERVANT SHOULD GET A MININIMUM25 YEARS OF SERVICEAND A MAXIMUM 30 YEARS OF SERVICE.AFTER SERVING THE GOVERNMENT FOR 30 YEARS ONE SHOULD COMPULSORILY RETIRE.RULES MAY BE MODIFIEDACCORDINGLY.NEEDNOT FIX AS 60 0R 62.
by completion of 30 years of service, every one should retire. With the salary of 60 years old employee, govt can get easily 2 youngsters in that cadre.
I think whatever has appeared in 'Deccan chronicle' is just a rumor.Government is not fool that just for two-three babus, whole lot of app. 5 million employees will get two more years of service. Government has already a tool of giving extension to their 'chamcha' babus.
The primary reasons for increasing the retirement age is retention of experienced govt servants. Since,there is ban on recruitment and acute shortage of staff in all the Central Govt Depts, there is no alternative but to increase the retirement age from 60 to 62. It's one of the methods to retain talent and experience.
It will be a wise decision of the central Government to increase the retirement age to 62 years of all category of employees. With this we will be able to utilise the services of the experienced lot in every field.
In order to keep its fincial balances in tact, the Indian Government must immediately raise the retirement age of all categories of its employees to 65 years.
This will also help the nation to utilise the services of the honest and hardworking persons.
in central gov retirement age 55 years is enough. young people are more efficient compare of these.
In order to keep its financial balances in tact, the Indian Government must immediately raise the retirement age of all categories of its employees to 65 years.This will also help the nation to utilise the services of the honest and hardworking persons.
Entry to Govt.service should be raised to 28 and retirement to 62/65. Those who fed up with service has always an option to quit/VRS. Then what is the problem.Those who want to serve let them serve. Those who donot want to serve let them leave.
No,no,nahi,nahi, don't increase the retirement age, it is not good for a country like India where lakhs of youth in between 22-27 are unemployed. 60 year of age is OK and if Govt. can reduced it to 58 it will beneficial to lakhs of young generation.
A central Govt. Employee
its good to increase the retirement age rm 60 to 62
when there there no burden on centre's effective budget as well as no obstacles on unemployed youth because unemployed-youth can only be employed on grass root level ie on initial post and can not be employed on senior level post/experienced post hence will not affact enhancement of retirement age of Govt. employees, having expertisation in the work of their respective organisation and will help to the new employees to become an expert to lead the nation in a better way.Hence Retirement age must be encreased to 62 or 65.
Why proposal for increase of Retirement Age is considered by Central Govt. This will adverse effect in work of Central Govt. Old person not wrked propely and promptly. this type of proposal is illegale and totally wrong
A.K. Verma,Patna
Retirement age of central govt. employees should never been increased by Govtnment. This will effect on future life of youngster. young people will become unemployed. Unemployment will creat a havoc situation in life .Therefore such proposal may be postpond for ever.
Deepti Verma,patna(Bihar)
Considering the fact that large amount of money is trained out from government exchequer towards pension and other settlement dues it is better to increase the retirement age to 62 years.But this extension should have some limitations viz based on their performance and confidential reports so extension in service upto 2 years can be given effect and their experience can be utilized in favor of government work . Govt should also think to increase recruitment age proportionate to increase in retirement age so, that youngsters should also be benefited.
Government in the interest of the unemployed youngsters should desist from this nasty idea to increase the retirement age.Infusing fresh talent in the system is always the most sceintific way to foster development and not hang up with oldies,however experienced they are. To fight a war with enemy nation the courage and zeal will be better exhibited in a newly recruited officer or soldier rather than the senior . To accomodate a few chamchas the Govt should not carry dead weight of all and sundry along. Such capable persons can always be advisors or effective social workers performing oputside the realm of Government .
Expressing a sincere feeling of a Disgruntled youth of India
IT IS RIDICULOUS TO KNOW THAT RETIREMENT AGE OF CENTRAL GOVT EMPLOYEES HAS NOT BEEN RAISED SINCE FINALIZATION IN 2009 BECAUSE MRS. SONIA GANDHI DESIRES TO BRING MR. PULOK CHATTERJEE AS CABINET SECY. AND WANTS SOME SENIOR PERSONNEL TO RETIRE.WHY CAN'T A PETITION BE FILED WITH SUPREME COURT FOR THIS ACT OF CORRUPTION ?
Government should increase the retirement age from 60 to 62 years immediately to save the large amount of exchequer to imbalance monetary policy of the nation.
SAMIR
Service extension of central government employees is a good news, if politicians, advocates can serve without age limit, then why not central government employees.
K. N. RAO
Entry to Govt.service should be raised to 28 and retirement to 62/65. Those who fed up with service has always an option to quit/VRS. Then what is the problem.Those who want to serve let them serve. Those who donot want to serve let them leave.
Surandra Kumar
The primary reasons for increasing the retirement age is retention of experienced govt servants. Since,there is ban on recruitment and acute shortage of staff in all the Central Govt Depts, there is no alternative but to increase the retirement age from 60 to 62. It's one of the methods to retain talent and experience.
Tanushree Biswas
I agree with the PIL. If not 65, the retirement age should be raised to 62 years. In Indian Railways, retired employee are taken on daily rate basis up to the age of 62 years and as such there should not be any hesitation to raise the retirement age up to 62 years.
Murari Jha.
INCREASE THE AGE OF SUPERANNUATION FROM 60 TO 62 YEARS FOR EMPLOYEES OF ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS IN CENTRAL GOVT OF INDIA
Sir,
Earlier it was usual practice that people used to serve the Govt of India for 40 to 42 years and the minimum qualification for joining Govt service was Matriculation only. During this long tenure people used to discharge their family and social responsibilities suitably.
I spent more time in my career and did my graduation before joining AFHQ as LDC and this holds good for thousands of other Govt servants who entered the Govt after serving higher studies. With the gradual crunch of employment opportunities even professional people like BE, MBA, MCA are joining the clerical service in the Govt. And they are not able to discharge their family and social responsibility suitably. The same is the case with me too.
The age of superannuation in respect of specialists included in the Teaching, non teaching and public health Sub cadres of Central Health Service shall be 62 years now. Eminent Scientists of international stature may be granted extension of service upto the age of 64 years. Specialists included in the Teaching sub cadres of the Central Health Service who are engaged only in teaching activities and not occupying administrative positions, the age of superannuation is 65 years. The Central Govt has given extension of service to the Secretary, Deptt of Space and the Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy, upto maximum age of 66 years.
The normal age has increased due to advanced medication and ultra modern medical facilities available in the market. The general man is medically fit and healthy these days as he is very conscious about his health.
I joined AFHQ on 21-08-1976 after doing my graduation in Commerce stream from a very reputed college of Delhi University, as a regular student. I am physically and mentally fit at the age of 59 years today. I could join Govt of India after the age of 24 years as I was busy in my academic career and preparation of competitive examinations. Therefore, I have not been able to serve the Govt of India for even 34 years. I have not been able to discharge my family and social responsiblities as yet suitably.
In view of the above I urge like minded people to join me in this crusade to pressurise the Govt to increase the age of supernannuation from 60 to 62 years.
Dipali Deb
When there is no specific restriction on the retirement age of politicians, govt. heads and the Judges etc., why not the government employees should get the benefit of increase in retirement age limit upto 65 or at least 62. About 55 Lacs people are working under Central Govt. and this number is proportionately very low keeping in view the huge population of 120 Crores. Age relaxation will not make any adverse impact on job opportunities for the unemployed.
Jahar Chakraborty
Sir,
It is an appreciable move towards utilisation of the expertise of the senior people. With the increase in the avilability of sophisticated medical facilities, the life span of the people in the recent past has increased and they are also energetic. The services and expertise of the senior people who retired from Central Government and Public sector undertakings is being greatly utilised by the private sector and benefits are reaped by the private sector. Extension of retirement age even by 5 years in Central and Public Sector will no way effect the employment potential as the possibility working by the senior people in place of new employees is remote.On the other hand in any office of the government/Organisation it will take minimum 2 to 3 years to develop a skilled employee through on the job training and other modalities. It can be noticed that in the recent past there is a drain of the retired/senior employees of various organisations to private sector particularly in the area of insurance, education,Banking and medical corporates. When they are able to deliver the goods in private sector it doesn't require any specific analysis to say that the expertise of the seniors can be best utilised in their own organisation itself. Also, these seniors can provide training and guidance to the new comers to carry the glory of their organisations. Hence, this will be a good move to increase the retirement age upto 62 or even upto 65
S.Rao
SIR,
I ON BEHALF OF THE YOUTH, REQUESTING TO CENTRAL GOVERNMENT MAY BE INCREASE THE RETIREMENT AGE UP TO 62 OR 65 YEARS IN A CONDITION THAT, A PERSON WILL BE RETIREMENT AFTER COMPLETION OF 30-32 YEARS OF SERVICE OR IN 62-65 YEARS WHICH WILL BE EARLIER.
BESIDES THE ABOVE AFTER 30-32 YEARS OF SERVICE SUCH PERSON WILL BE RETIREMENT THIS IS MANDATORY.
The entire logic for extension of 2 yrs of retirement age seems to be hypothetical.Unless fresh recruitment is made & a cycle of fresh PF & pension funds is generated we are not going to accumulate the fund for retiring persons. By postponding we are only shifting the problem for further 2 yrs.Fresh recruits require less pay at bottom level, filled with high energy to work & also help to catch the employment problem.Govt. should rethink its decision for extending retire age from 60 to 62 in National intrest.
SIR,
I have on behalf of central government employees . In India there is every 100 retirement government is recruiting equal and less than 25-35 in various department . Due to this work load is increasing and simultaneously government pension money is increasing now the central government has ban the pension plan .
because it is grad pay + basic pay and after 80 years it will become double and a retired person would live atlest 80 yesrs . And india gornment will give 25 lakh cores to pensioners and every yesr it will gradually incresess .
I dont think due to this , any effect in central government recruiting process will raise because government will recruite in limited seat if you will incres 2 year or decrease .....!!! :)
The entire logic for extension of 2 yrs of retirement age seems to be hypothetical.Unless fresh recruitment is made & a cycle of fresh PF & pension funds is generated we are not going to accumulate the fund for retiring persons. By postponding we are only shifting the problem for further 2 yrs.Fresh recruits require less pay at bottom level, filled with high energy to work & also help to catch the employment problem.Govt. should rethink its decision for extending retire age from 60 to 62 in National intrest
Age relaxation will not make any adverse impact on job opportunities for the unemployed.
Sir,
As a central government employee,my personal opinion is that, the govt. should not increase the retirement age 60 to 62 at any cost. If govt will take decision to increase retirement age limit, it will be harmful for UPA government and also revolution will be arise by the youth.
priti,cuttack
Its foolish decision of Govt. of India to increase the
retirement Age from 60 to 62 years. Well I am also babu and still 10 years' of service left, but I observed that most of these lot of babus of yesteryears' are corrupted and does not want to work and keeping them for another 2 years' is a disgusting
decision of G of India. So it's my urged that kindly think many times before implementing. Well I think their is no problem of exchequer to provide pension as our economy is in sound position and we are not in a situation like in 1999.So please for God sake Honorable PM sir not to implement .
Anil Mumbai
The retirement age expected to increase will further increase the non employment and promotional scope of Govt Employee. This is not the right time to take this decision.
It is very good decision of Govt of India to increase the age of Central Govt Employee.By this method Govt will utilised the experience and skill of old employee.
Suresh Delhi
Mental and physical test should be taken and those found fit should only be allowed to continue after 60 Yrs.
People nearing 60 become lethargic and not open to new and progressive ideas. Moreover, most of them happen to be suffering from hypertension, high blood pressure and a plethora of debilitating diseases. Their productive value in 90% of the cases do not commensurate with the salary drawn. Hence it is not advisable to increase the age compulsorily for 2 years by paying host of service benefits without an iota of return in terms of service.; Rather, it should be open to the Govt/Department to be able to retain their valuable staff for a max pd of 2 years after their retirement
Respected All,
This is a very very good decision from govt. They should increase the retirement age from 60 to 62 years.
It is true that youngstar should get chance , There is plenty of chance and oppurtunity to show their cablibaar and agression in private jobs.
tharfore we need some senior person who can serve more to nation and take India one step ahead.
After all ::: OLD IS GOLD ::::
Regards
Dilip Kumar Yadav
37 SP Mukherjee Raod Kolkata 26.
if you are near 10 Janpath, your retirement will be increased?
There should not be any disparity in this country in the retirement age. Retirement ploicy must be equal to each and every central Govt employees. it may be 62, 65, or 70 , Every body must enjoy the same. In some cases people are not available, they also should retire and go for contractual with full facilities.Then people of the country will have the faith on the present GOVT.ALL ORE ONE which may lead the country to proceed further. JAI HIND
after 50 yrs alll govt servants are relaxing without doing any work.their pre occupied mind set is giving troubles for younger generation.they can be given soe money to retire and disposed off
Even after 65 years of independence still there is a disparity in the country like INDIA. Some where 65 extended to 70 , some where 62 and some where 60 It should not be like this. Every body must enjoy the same in the independent country. In the case of Physical education personnel in IITs it was increased to 62years suddenly it came down to 60. If it increased to 62 with in a couple of months how it can be reduced to 60 years. It is realy surpriseing. All the institutions under CFTI are enjoying 62 How IIT Physical education personnel will be at 60 . It is realy hearting people, working at IITs of the country. The country will progress if the parity will be maintained.I feel Under CFTI all shoulkd be treated equally. Thank You
MR .PAVAN KUMAR SHARMA
It is better to increase retirement age to 62 years considering they are well experienced and ,large amount of money is trained out from government exchequer towards pension. So, it is always good to utilize their experience in favor of government work.Moreover, life expectancy has also been increased. Govt should also think to increase recruitment age proportionate to increase in retirement age so, that youngsters should also be benefited.
MR. PAVAN KUMAR SHARMA
It is better to increase retirement age to 62 years considering they are well experienced and ,large amount of money is trained out from government exchequer towards pension. So, it is always good to utilize their experience in favor of government work.Moreover, life expectancy has also been increased. Govt should also think to increase recruitment age proportionate to increase in retirement age so, that youngsters should also be benefited.
In my openion the retirement age of central Govt.employees should be increased to 62 or 65 like the teachers of the country. Every employees must be treated equally , then People of the country will have the faith on the present GOVT.why some at 65,some at 62 and some at 60 . It is realy painfull to the employees those who will retire at 60.GOvt should consider and treat all C.Govt employees equally.Now a days the discipline has washed out from the country.Everybody wants to became a hero and indisciplined because of worng treatment and disparity in the policy . JAIHIND ( INDIAN)
The age of retirement shoud be increased 65 years.
Most of the present generation do not like to work in Govt Sector due to less sallary Hence it will not effect the new generation at all .Every body wants to became engineers, doctors and scientist and work in private sectors day and night . How it will effect the present generation when the wont like to join the Govt job. when the teachers work up to 70 why not the other employees at 65 Definitey it must be considered for 65 years JAI HIND
To mantain the parity and transparency in the country the retirement age of all the central Govt, Employees should be equaal.in certain cases the employees not available they must be extended up to 70 according to their quality and capacity on contract by giving all facilities.
India is ONE it should remain One only .All should be treated equally .
Retirement age of central GOVT employees should be raised from 60 to 62 years . In India those who are getting handsome sallary, their retirement age is going on increasing , where as the low paid central Govt employees working very sincerely and honestly their age of retireing is not at all taken in to consideration.Its relay pathetic. Govt should consider for 62 years.
One side its is good news but other side it is not correct because India is growing vast in all aspects comparing with other developed nations ....as per my suggestion is not fair to increase age for central government employees think it is fair or not so many young India's are wasting their timing not get employment according to their ages
Retirement age of Central gov employees should be raised as per it can cause a great loss to our economic status moreover the most eligible seniors getting retired can lead to loss of most prominent eligible seniors who are working with a spirit of honesty and faith towards there work..
Tee age of central Govt employees should be increased to 62 to bring the transparency and justice in the country.We are INDIANS. Every body must be treated equally.This may be only reason to bring the discipline in the country. Now every body is a hero. Nobody listens because of the disparity.
The present GOVT. can make the people united and bring displine. This may be hte only way to win the heart of all the central Govt. employees. JAIHIND ( An INDIAN )
India is one.Rules must be equall to all.Every body is controlled by the govt.Parity and discipline must be maintained.If some body does not follw the rules he must be punished.
To bring all the above Govt must implement the right policy. All must retire eighther at 62 or 65 years, but Govt wants to make the division.How the people will be happy with the decesion? It is highly injustice to a loyal employee.So all must be retire at 62 or 65. so that there will be a faith to the govt. where the people of the Nation will have a full support to the Govt.( An INDIAN )
Institutions Under CFTI the age of superannuation of Physical education personnel and Librerians are
62 years.
But it is so.. so... sad that the Physical Education Personnel and Librerians (of Only IITS) are retiring in the age of 60 Years excluding the other Institutes under CFTI. Why such type of disparity is created ? It may be a great loss to the people retires at 60 years.They have got a lots of contribution for the all round developement of personality of the students.Now a days all most all the companies even there is a provision of keeping Asst Director Physical Educatin/ Sports Officer to balance every thing.
HENCE THE AGE OF SUPERANNUATION OF ALL PHYSICAL EDUCATION PERSONNEL AND LIBRERIANS AT IIT SHOULD BE 62 YEARS Like other institutes under C F T I
To make India beautiful and well disciplined the age of retirement of all the employees should be equal.People will be definitely obey the orders of the GOVT.There should not be any difference in the policy. Policy must be ONE .People of the Nation had the faith on GOVT. ,To bring the faith again Policy must be Uniform. India will prosper more and more .
Even after 65 years of Independence still there is no uniform policy in the retirement Age.Even in central Govt.there are diffrent rule. for teachers 65 Yrs extended to 70. A group 62Yrs and other Groups 60 . This will spoil the Beautiful and powerful country. India is One and, One polocy must be adopted. If some one is highly needed for the country, They may be extended till death by giving all sorts of facilities as earlier.
But policy should be one where the Indians will be well disciplined and follw the orders of the GOVT.No body will dare. He will be scared for the punishment of the Govt
increasing aretirement age is good idea....govrnment should think about it positivly.
The present society does not like to join the GOVT Jobs,due to less salaries, for which most of the retired people are asked again to join on contractual with a limited sally. How one can say that there will be problem for the young generation if it will increase 62 yrs ?
Certainly NOT. So the best policy is to increase the retirement age to 62 years. so that all the cetral Govt employees rather will be satishfied and support the present Govt.As the policy for retirement in the central Govt also differs like 60,62,65 and 70.It is highly injustice. Uniform policy should be implemented to all the central Govt employees. If some one is not avilable they must be extended to 65 or 70 by giving all the facilities as earlier. So Definitely it should be extended to 62.
All the Govt Employees should be under one banner. Sallary and facility may be different as per their Qualifications and elligibilities. But the retirement policy must be one.So that the people of the Nation will have the faith upon the present Govt.Altimately all will be disciplined . Every body will follow the Law and order of the Govt.
Why to day the situation is bad ? because of disparity and injustice to the honest and sincere people.If we fight among our self, our country may be weaker in future. So all must be united and one policy must be implemented to all central Govt. Employees. Every indian must be satishfied.
Institutions under CFTI the age of superannuation of physical education personnel and librerians are 62 years,but it is very sad that the physical education personnel and librerians (of IITs)are retiring in the age of 60 years excluding the other institute under CFTI.
Why such type of discrimination?
The age of superannuation of all physical education personnel and librerians of IIT should be 62 years like other institute under CFTI, as per previous order.
Increasing of retirement age from 60 to 62 is very helpfull idea,mainly lowpaid emploies should bless the goverment.Goverment should think about it.
Retirement age of physical education personnel and librerians of IITs should be 62 years.
For betterment of the central Govt. Employees, the society and the Nation, the Govt. Should consider for 62 Years .
They will be highly happy like the teachers and other employees who retire at 62,or 65 years.All must be treated equally.Govt should win the hearts of the people by adopting the similar policy.
subject to medical fitness like in defense forces. Medical examination should also be carried out by a Medical Board constituted on the lines of Defense Forces
Ugc must bring the retirement age of librarians and physical education directors to 65 years on par with other academic staff of the colleges, this will remove the disparity ,as they are equally and highly qualified,and work under same conditions for the same students,for the same cause i.e. for the better results of the college and students .This debate will continue till the age of retirement is 65 years for librarians and physical education directors.
The retirement policy must be ONE to all the central Govt employees.
There is a disparity in the policy. Like 60,62,65 and 70. Facilities like pay scales and other things may be given as per the qualifications and experiences,but policy of retirement should be one.
Secondly Institutions Under CFTI all the Librerians and the Physical education personnel retires at 62 years as per 6th pay commission. Where as in IITs the retirement is 60 for Librerians and Physical education personnel . So Govt should consider to impliment again the same policy like the institutions under CFTI. People of the Nation should be happy with the policy.
Thirdly once it is enhenced to 62 years in Sept. 2009.Suddenly with in a couple of months it brought down to 60 years.It is realy very painful to those who will be retiring at 60 years. So Govt should reconsider for 62 years to Librerians and Physical education personnel working at IIT.Govt should treat all equally so that the people of the Nation will be very happy.It is in the hands of Govt . to win the hearts of the People. An INDIAN
Govt should utilise the most experienced employees by increasing the retirement age to 62 which may help to develope the country. It also help the Govt to bring the transparency in the country where the citizen of the Nation will be more happy and will be well disciplined. Laws and order should be carried out if one policy will be implimented.For some body 62 . some at 65 and certain people at 70. It hearts the people of the Nation.Govt should not give any kind of chances to the public to point out on the policy. All are One India is One so all must get all kind of facilities . Sallaries may differ, Status may differ ,facility may be different, but policy should not be different.So definitely it should be considered for 62 Years to win the hearts of the people of the Beautiful Nation.All will have to follow the rules if it is justified. It is easy to punish if some one breaks the rules . So Govt. should consider for 62 or 65 .
One Retirement policy should be implimented. Eighther 62.or 65 or 70
In India
1. Teachers 65 leading to 70
2. Scientific officers and other teachers 65
3. some A grade officer 62.
4. Some are at 60 years.
WHY it is like this Sir . Why donot you make 62 or 65 to all the central Govt Employees. People of this Nice country will be very Happy. Jai Hind
The Physical education personnel and the Librerians of IITs retirement was 62 years as mentioned in 6th Pay commission. All the Institutions Like IITs, IISc,NITs, IISER IIM, under CFTI are 62 years in their retirement . But it is suprising that IITs are shepareted and make the retirement in 60 years. It is nothing just to creat the disparity in the country and heatening the people working in IITs.Hence Govt. should take care and make them again to 62 years like the institutes under CFTI.
As per CFTI, the Retirement age of Physical education personnel and the Librerians were 62 years. Once it is declared to 62 years ,suddenly it is reduced to 60 that to only in IITS except the other institutes under CFTI.Even certain Staes the provide 62 years for their retirement. It is nothing just harrashing which may effet to all the citizen of a country. The people of the beautiful Nation will loose the faith upon the present Govt.Hence once again it should be brought to 62 years. Each and every people will be very happy .To win the heart of the people of the country the transparency should be maintained.Altimately the people of the nation will be well disciplined and follow the rule of the country. Thank You Sir. Jai Hind
India should adopt the uniform policy for the central Govt Employees.There should not be any kind of discremination in the policy. If some are not available they may be extended for 3 to 5 years in their service as per their experience and qualifications. But policy should be the same. Retirement of Central Govt Employees is a major issue. It should not be utilised differently to different catagory of people. Pl. See and do the best for the citizen of the country.
Under CFTI,institute like IIT is the best among all.
but very sad to say that their retirement is 60 years. where other institutes like IISC,IISER,NITS,IIM
are enjoying 62 years. Even cerain other colleges and universities of the states , they also retire at 62 years. only the IIT Physical education personnel and librerians will be retiring at 60 Years. Pl see and give JUSTICE to them.People, society, and the nation will feel that workin in IIT as has got some importance
As Per MHRD(6Th pay commission)under CFTI All the Institute like IIT,IIM,IISC,IISER,NITS, retirement age of physical education personnel was 62 years,but suddenly it has announced that age of retirement should be 60years instead of 62years only for IITs.
But why?
As per CFTI, the Retirement age of Physical education personnel and the Librerians were 62 years. Once it is declared to 62 years ,suddenly it is reduced to 60 that to only in IITS except the other institutes under CFTI.Even certain Staes the provide 62 years for their retirement. It is nothing just harrashing which may effet to all the citizen of a country. The people of the beautiful Nation will loose the faith upon the present Govt.Hence once again it should be brought to 62 years. Each and every people will be very happy .To win the heart of the people of the country the transparency should be maintained.Altimately the people of the nation will be well disciplined and follow the rule of the country. Thank You Sir. Jai Hind.ncs
I am not in favuor of increasing the retirement age for Government employees.
Instead we should think for creation of jobs for youth. Youths are the assets of our country. It is very important for us to create jobs for qualified youths so that they are not indulged in bad activities.
People are working for more seven to eight hours per day in MNCs without any additional financial benefit. In fact, MNCs are exploiting the youth and forcing them for extra hours. With the result, employees will be over tired at the age of 45 to 50. This is not good for any country.
Let the salary of employees in MNCs be restricted so that additional staff is recruited/employed to meet the additional requirement.
Government should ensure that working hours in MNCs are controlled/limited to fixed hours.
IN fact, there should be retirement age for every person who so ever is serving the Nation irrespective of his position.
Since there is no restriction / retirement age for politician than why retirement age for Government employees.
A Government Employee
People says youth are not getting Jobs . Is it so,
How ? when youth is not educated well . what sorts of job will be given by the govt. So in my view the poor people must be given education first from the root levle and be educated well . Almost all the youth are going in the software jobs rest are not educated well, and people say they are our asset of the country and not getting the jobs. 2ndly youth of the country does not like to join the Govt Jobs, they want to became rich with in a short period .If so why Govt is extending the service and allowing the govt employees to work on contractual ? so It should be 62 years only to save the nation and its organisations. otherwise Govt may not get the people to work where it may effect the Govt offices
lot of people retirement this month ...and lot of Government Employee waiting 62 year..plz do fast...
In the 6th pc college librarians retirement age was 62 years where as the age lecturers increased to65years by Ugc & Hrd as it always plays this game of divide and rule tactics in every Pay commission, this time it was not different,inspite of several Supeame, High court & Cat judgements saying that people working under same woring conditions,requiring same qualifications should have same pay sacles and retirement age and other sevice benifits.So atleast now ugc must declare retirement age for librarians as 65 years.as 7th pay commission is also nearing still 6th pc anomalies are not rectified.
It is so sad that till date the Govt has not decided to make the retirement age to 62 years. lots of people are retiring. It must be decided soon.People are quite healthy and active . They can easily work up to 65 years comfortable where their experience may be helpful for the organisation of the country.Hear Teachers 65 to 70 and others 60 How this thing can be separated. Hear the people of the country are unhappy upon the policy of the GOVT. Why not all must be treated equally.INDIA IS ONE . POLICY MUST BE ONE. Where INDIA may be quite stronger than any other country. JAI HIND ( A True Indian )
In most of the developed countries, it is seen that the retirement age of Govt. and Public Sector employees is between 62-65 years and some governments are contemplating to increase the retirement age even beyond 65 years. So, there is nothing wrong if our Government too increases the retirement age in line with other countries.
DONT RETIRE EXPERIENCED PEOPLE SO EARLY.RETIREMENT AGE SHOULD BE INCREASED BY 5 YRS MINIMUM. MANMOHAN JI KUCH KARO ECONOMY KE LIYE BHI ACHA HOGA*****
Why the Govt is considering retirement age of 62 yers. Instead of increasing retirement age, an option/willingness should be obtained before retirement from those who want to volunteer/render their services on contractual basis on honourarium pay after retirement. This will help any of the Organization to appoint their such experienced person on selection basis only and not only this but also there will be a minor expenditure load on the Govt Exchequer, instead of paying the huge amount of regular pay (inclusive of 4 aditional DA and two annual increment till remaining in the regular service upto the age of 62 years. PLEASE CONSIDER
As Per CFTI the age of superannuation of physical education personnel is 62. where as only in IITs the physical education personnel are retiring at 60 years.? It is highly injustice. Why don't the policy must be the same ?.
Some of the institutes under CFTI they are enjoying 62 , but in IITs it is 60. Is it not injustice ? Kindly look this matter seriously and bring the single rule and transparency in the country. People of the nation will be happy upon the present Govt. A True Indian
what could i say is, just give time to our forefather to stay out of job and let them enjoy there life, 29 years in service is enough, too long, because life today is limited to 80 years per person so why don't give them a chance to look around the earth quadrangle, anyway they have done their part as a citizen within the country, life is short,enjoy it, because once you are dead no more. If we will extend the retirement age then it seems that we are limiting them.
Age of superannuation of Physical Education Personnel are 62 years as per CFTI. All institutes under CFTI they are enjoying . but how the IITs are not following the same rule as it is comming under CFTI ?.
Why there is disparity in this policy. MHRD,GOVT of India should take the steps immediately and rectify the mistakes. People are retiring.It is nothing but spoiling the image.
Sir,
All Physical Education personnel are retiring at the age of 62 years.It is applicable to all the Institutes Under CFTI as per the MHRD order . IITs also are coming under CFTI,then how the physical education personnel in IITs are retiring at the age of 60 years ? Why there is disparity ? It is nothing just to spoil the families and their children those who are effected.Every institute under CFTI should have the same rules.It is realy a very bad situation created by a limited people. GOVT should consider and implement the uniform policy to all the institutes under CFTI. People of the country will be very happy when there will be a uniform policy.So in this situation Govt should reconsider and increase the retiring Age to 62 years.
All the Physical Education personnel of the Institutes under CFTI are enjoying 62 years as their retirement.
But in IITs which is also Under CFTI they retire at 60 years. Why such type of disparity is there ? If possible kindly look in to the matter and give the justice to the effected People working at IITs as a Physical education personnel. Save their families their children and the society.
Retriement age enhancement to 62 years is beneficial for Govt also,huge pension benifit may be avoided for atleast two years.Further it is not affected to the recruitment in Govt jobs, since those people who are in the verge of retirment are at the senior position where no recruitment is done by the Govt.Further Average life span has increased in that case 60yrs is not too old both physically and mentally.There is no age bar for politicians then why discrimination for Govt employees only.Further many state has started raising the reirement age of educationist to 65 years.
Under present circumstances it is advantegious for Govt to enhance retirement age of Govt employees.
In our country there are so many people are unemployed. Why they need to make extension more 2 years any way after retirement they are getting pensions.
Why there is a disparity in the retirement of age.some are at 65 lead to 70 and some are 62 and some are at 60. why? this may spoil the mentality of the people of the country. If some are not available , let them be extended by giving all the facilities.
ALL MUST BE TREATED EQUALLY. SO THAT THE PEOPLE OF THE COUNTRY WILL HAVE THE FAITH ON THE PRESENT GOVT.
I FEEL EVERY BODY SHOUILD BE RETIRED BY 62 YEARS.
tHIS MAY BE THE PERFECT DECESION FOR THE NATION. (JAIHIND)
India is a beautiful country. we must save the country by giving the equal opportunities to the people of the Nation. If the retirement policy will be equal them most of the people will be highly happy.
As a citizen of the country every body must retire at the age of 62 years. if some one is important they must be extended for some years. UNIFORMITY WILL HELP TO PROGRESS. jai Hind
The retirement policy must be uniform. Reg. Liberians and Physical education personnel ,in Some institutes 60 and some are 62. But under CFTI all were 62 yrs.
How only IIT can be separated . It should not be at any cost. The Physical education personnel have lots of contribution towards the brilliant students, for the all round development of their personality. The product of IIT are the masters of the country.Wherever you see one IITan is the boss. When the Physical personnel have a great contribution why not they should retire at the age of 62 years. Kindly look in this matter very deeply and make 62 yrs where the we can save the country and their masters. JAI HIND
please increase the retirement age of the railway employees
THE RETIREMENT OF AGE OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION PERSONNEL AND LIBRARIAN IN IITS MUST BE 62 YEARS.UNDER CFTI THE LIBRARIANS AND PHYSICAL EDUCATION PERSONNEL ARE RETIRING AT 62 YEARS.
WHY IN IITS ONLY 60YEARS.
IS IT NOT A INJUSTICE TO THE PEOPLE
SO GOVT. SHOULD SEND THE ORDERS SOON TO SAVE THEM
central government employes are able to do his work honestly and more capable to do his duties at 9.00am. to 6.00 pm. every day.
Physical education personnel in IIT they takes utmost care of the IIT Students( The creams of the country) The physical activities and other activities related Physical education and sports science are the best asset to the students.The Govt of India has declared 62 years as their retirement as they have a lot of contribution towards the student who will be the best product of the Nation.In Most of the big organisations these people are the bosses. when they have been taken care of by the physical education personnel in IIT system , How only in IIT their age of retirement have been reduced? As per CFTI all institutes are enjoying 62 Year why in IIT it has been reduced 60. It is really a punishment to the people.Now it is proved that those who contribute for the welfare of the nation they are the most sufferers. I feel as per CFTI all the physical education personnel should retire at 62 years as they have a lots of contribution towards the IIT students who will be the best citizen of the country. Kindly make 62 years as retirement for Physical education personnel like other institutes. Jai Hind
Most of the people say the young mass will be the great sufferers if it will be 62 years as retirement. How ? it is not at all possible.
When a young mass does not have the proper education , in what way the country will save them. How he will be able to get a perfect Govt, Job? do you feel that by making 60 years you will save the young mass? No... Never... rather it may be great problem to the country.The well experienced people are forced to retire at 60. You can not get their substitute, Hence the age of retirement should be 62 years.
It is very enough to work in an organisation minimum for 25years & maximum for 30 years. The age limit for retirement also fixed at 55 years & never 60 or 62 & the emploee should retier whichever is earlier. Chance should givien to youngsters.
Chandra Sekhar Behera,Rly,Rayagada.
Every where there is disparity in superannuation of age. Why not Govt should take care of this and make Uniform policy in the retirement age.
Some where 62, Some are 65 and some are at 60 years
Why ? why? These things spoil the the love and affection of the people those who loves the present GOVT. These are the main reasons of the division of the people. Make a single policy and implement in the country
There should be uniform policy all over the country in repect of all Government/State Government offices.The retirement age shold be in Governent 62 years
PLEASE MAKE ANIFORM RETIREMENT POLICY AT THE INSTITUTES UNDER ( CFTI.) THE IIT LIBRERIANS AND PHYSICAL EDUCATION PERSONNEL ARE COMPELLED TO RETIRE AT 60. WHERE AS IN OTHER INSTITUTES UNDER CFTI ARE RETIRING AT 62 YEARS( IT MUST BE UNIFORM ) IN almost ALL ORGANIZATIONS THERE IS ONE SANCTIONED POST. ( In-charge )
THE PERSON RECRUITED AGAINST THE ONE SANCTIONED POST
OF LIBRARIAN OR A SPORTS OFFICER SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR Rs 10000 Grade pay AND SHOULD RETIRE AT THE AGE OF 62 YEARS. HOW ALL THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION PERSONNEL AND LIBRARIANS WILL BE GIVEN RS 10000 Gr PAY IN ONE INSTITUTE AND WILL RETIRE AT 62 YEARS ( ALL became Bosses who will ruin the entire System). Pl consider the person who has been recruited against the permanent Post. People are buttering the Authority and getting the Gr. Pay of Rs 10000 even though they are not qualified and retiring at 62 years. Please see the injustice.The Honest people are suffering having all sorts of qualifications. Help the honest person and save the country.
India is a beautiful country.All the rules for retirement must be equal.As C F T I declares 62 years as retirement for Phy. Edn Personnel and librarians of all the institutes . But in IITs how people are getting retired at 60 years ? Pl see and do justice to Physical education personnel and librarians in IITs
welcome decision,retirement age at 62 years,but not compulsory but optional.
In IIT system The physical education personnel and librarians should retire at 62 years as it is under CFTI. In IITs people even with out proper qualifications they are given PB 3 and given 62years as retirement.Only one person who is recruited against the permanent position Post should retire at 62 years . How all the physical education personnel in one IIT will get 10000 GP and retire at 62 years ? Pl see and give justice to the honest people.SAVE THE COUNTRY. Corrupt people are getting all the benefits. JAI HIND
How only IIT physical edeucation personnel and librarians retire at 60 years ? as it is under CFTI. Govt should control the Policy not the IITs. The policy adopted by the Govt all the employees Under CFTI should be equal.It is so sad that only in IITs the retirement of Physical education personnel and librarians are 60 years. Why this injustice? pl look
and give justice to the honest people and make it 62 years as retirement. An Indian
Most of the people say the young mass will be the great sufferers if it will be 62 years as retirement. How ? it is not at all possible.
When a young mass have the proper education, the country will save them. He will be able to get a perfect Govt.Job do you feel that by making 62 years you will save the young mass? No... Never... rather it may be great problem to the country.The well old peoples are required to retire at 60 or less that 60. You can get their substitute, Hence the age of retirement should not be 62 years.
Dr. P.R. Chavan
it should be 70 and not 62 why that the govt to decide
Make it 62 years for physical educational personnel and librarians as in every institutes under CFTI are 62 years as the retirement.
Do soon People are going on retiring.
Govt should take the responsibility . It is so..... so..... sad that all the institutes under CFTI are 62 years . Only IIT is 60.
Make it 62 years for physical educational personnel and librarians as in every institutes under CFTI are 62 years as the retirement.
Do soon People are going on retiring.
Govt should take the responsibility . It is so..... so..... sad that all the institutes under CFTI are 62 years . Only IIT is 60.
Retirement policy must be equal . It does not mean that some where 62 and some where 65 . Every where the institutes under CFTI must be same . How only IIT the premier institute of the country can be separated from other institutes under CFTI.All the physical education personnel and librarians of the institutions under CFTI must be same . may be 62 or 65 . The Govt must take care of this sensitive issue and bring in to a right solution.Make 62 or 65 Years as retirement. Jai Hind.
Should be 62 year like state govt job.specialy teacher can give more to his student .
It is highly injustice made to the Physical Education Personnel and librarians working in IIT (THE Best institutes of the NATION ). They are being forced to retire at the age of 60 years . As CFTI has declared in (2009 ) for all the Technical indtitutes , like IITs, NITs, IISER. IISc Bangalore and other central universities that the Age of superannuation of age is 62 years.
Why this type of disparity is made. The present GOVT must look in to he matter deeply and solve the problem of the innocent people who contributes for the welfare of the students who are the best in the WORLD
All physical education personnel should retire at the age of 62 years but at IITs the same are being forced to retire at 60 Years. When all institutes under CFTI
are retiring at 62 why in IITs it is different?.
All the state , technical universities and central universities, the physical education are retiring at 62 years. Govt should consider and make the retirement age 62 years at IITs also.
When there is no specific restriction on the retirement age of politicians, govt. heads and the Judges etc., why not the government employees should get the benefit of increase in retirement age limit upto 65 or at least 62. About 55 Lacs people are working under Central Govt. and this number is proportionately very low keeping in view the huge population of 120 Crores. Age relaxation will not make any adverse impact on job opportunities for the unemployed.
All physical education personnel should retire at the age of 62 years but at IITs the same are being forced to retire at 60 Years. When all institutes under CFTI
are retiring at 62 why in IITs it is different?.
All the state , technical universities and central universities, the physical education are retiring at 62 years. Govt should consider and make the retirement age 62 years at IITs also.
All physical education personnel should retire at the age of 62 years but at IITs the same are being forced to retire at 60 Years. When all institutes under CFTI
are retiring at 62 why in IITs it is different?.
All the state , technical universities and central universities, the physical education are retiring at 62 years. Govt should consider and make the retirement age 62 years at IITs also.
It is highly injustice made to the Physical Education Personnel and librarians working in IIT (THE Best institutes of the NATION ). They are being forced to retire at the age of 60 years . As CFTI has declared in (2009 ) for all the Technical indtitutes , like IITs, NITs, IISER. IISc Bangalore and other central universities that the Age of superannuation of age is 62 years.
Why this type of disparity is made. The present GOVT must look in to he matter deeply and solve the problem of the innocent people who contributes for the welfare of the students who are the best in the WORLD
etirement policy must be equal . It does not mean that some where 62 and some where 65 . Every where the institutes under CFTI must be same . How only IIT the premier institute of the country can be separated from other institutes under CFTI.All the physical education personnel and librarians of the institutions under CFTI must be same . may be 62 or 65 . The Govt must take care of this sensitive issue and bring in to a right solution.Make 62 or 65 Years as retirement. Jai Hind.
THE RETIREMENT OF AGE OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION PERSONNEL AND LIBRARIAN IN IITS MUST BE 62 YEARS.UNDER CFTI THE LIBRARIANS AND PHYSICAL EDUCATION PERSONNEL ARE RETIRING AT 62 YEARS.
WHY IN IITS ONLY 60YEARS.
IS IT NOT A INJUSTICE TO THE PEOPLE
SO GOVT. SHOULD SEND THE ORDERS SOON TO SAVE THEM
It is so sad that till date the Govt has not decided to make the retirement age to 62 years. lots of people are retiring. It must be decided soon.People are quite healthy and active . They can easily work up to 65 years comfortable where their experience may be helpful for the organisation of the country.Hear Teachers 65 to 70 and others 60 How this thing can be separated. Hear the people of the country are unhappy upon the policy of the GOVT. Why not all must be treated equally.INDIA IS ONE . POLICY MUST BE ONE. Where INDIA may be quite stronger than any other country. JAI HIND ( A True Indian )
For betterment of the central Govt. Employees, the society and the Nation, the Govt. Should consider for 62 Years .
They will be highly happy like the teachers and other employees who retire at 62,or 65 years.All must be treated equally.Govt should win the hearts of the people by adopting the similar policy.
Dear manmohan Ji it should be 70 years and not 62, why pay old age pension take work from experienced hand and keep him occupied also.
Retirement age of pda employees should be as per fitness of employee. If mentally ok and physically healthy one should continue working.
Think out of the box don't retire people make them work it keeps them going for the benefit of the society. It is not knowledge but wisdom that keeps peace in society.
Smart governments like Poland already have retirement age as 67 India government is smarter. See the announcement that will be made, it would be exemplary and world will copy it.
Prime minister an octogenarian. President too stepped into his eighties. Leaders who hog the limelight are in their sixties. Chief ministers mostly are in their early sixties. It goes on to show that men are quite agile mentally in their sixties. They remain fit enough physically to discharge their official duties given to perform beyond the age of sixty. With their experience and expertise gathered over years of service they are more likely to serve the Govt. better. Hence, an enhancement in the age of superannuation would only assure better service to the people. Hence any decision to increase the age of superannuation to 65 years would not only benefit the incumbent but also the Govt. and the people. Such decision would embody a fiscal rationale also. Given that average life expectancy has increased beyond 80 years Govt. had to burden the deferred payment (pension)for a much longer period. Then why not give an extension to their service by another 5 years. The apprehension that that any enhancement in the age of retirement would have an adverse effect on employment is belied by the fact in our country teeming with one billion plus people Govt servant account for only 3.5 million. Govt. had to create jobs to address this problem. For that too the service of senior bureaucrats / technocrats will come in handy. So, enhance the retirement age immidiately. The issue cannot brook any delay.
Why there is no age limit or retirement age for the rulers (POLITICIANS). Actually as per recruitment rules 18-25 till 60 in the central govt., it can be ( 35-65 ) AGE LIMITS FOR THE POLITICIANS TO RULE OVER INDIA. THAT TOO WELL EDUCATED PERSONS HAVING GOOD KNOWLEDGE OF THE countries upliftment.
RETIREMENT AGE OR AGE OF SUPERANNUATION CAN BE INCREASED UPTO 65 YEARS WITH THE RIDER AND OPTION TO ANY EMPLOYEE TO TAKE VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT. IN THIS WAY, I FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT MORE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CAN BE CREATED.
THE UPPER AGE LIMIT FOR GOVT JOB SHOULD ALSO BE INCREASED TO TAP QUALIFIED AND EXPERIENCED PERSONS IN GOVT JOB. SINCE LARGE NO. OF POSTS IN CENTRAL SECRETARIATS, GOVT DEPARTMENTS, AUTONOMOUS BODIES OF THE CENTRAL GOVT ARE LYING VACANT AND ARE MANAGED THROUGH THE SO CALLED "consultants" (Retd. govt. servants appointed on contract basis with consolidated pay) in large number in all departments, THE ABOVE IDEA OF INCREASING AGE LIMIT WOULD HOLD GOOD.
Increasing retirement age from 60 to 62 years shall give in positive results. Many essential /new infra projects have been planned in our country but due to no availability of budgetary support /allocation, the projects either delayed , discarded or not worked out . Increasing retirement age shall instantly generate huge amount of funds in government treasury for current time and so on regularly due to holding on payment of retirement benefits. In addition, this will automatically contribute to continuous availability of the matured skill , source funds for launching of essential /new projects , earning of more revenue from taxes ,lesser expenses on pension as well as generation of employment through new projects etc. These are the needs of the time for our nation to come in parity with other countries of the world who have adopted /implemented the policy of enhancing the retirement age much earlier and now are more advanced .Further, it has been observed that life expectancy, however increased continuously over past few decades due to better and improved medical facilities and more health cautiousness among elderly people. Also, it has been seen that people use to re-join jobs in private organisation after being retired from government sector. They now , get pay packet and enjoy pension as well with retirement benefits ( PF, GRATUITY, LEAVE ENCASHMENT,PENSION SURRENDER … ) . Government /people should think over the issue whether there is gain or loss for the nation
I am extremely impressed along with your writing abilities, Thanks for this great share.